000			01580cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS42734
008			090401t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u38628
041			_aeng
245			_aGrayless v Watkinson
260			_c(1990 21 EG 163-170(5)
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1990 21 EG 163-170(5)
520			_aCA 21 February 1990. Appeal by the landlord (W) from a cc decision in favour of the tenant (G)`s right to recover the cost of replacing the roof of a barn . Under a previous arbitration it had been determined that replacement was not the liability of G. W accepted that it was his liability under Maintenance, Repair and Insurance of Fixed Equipment Regulations 1973, but failed to respond to G`s request to carry out the work. G went ahead and carried out the work himself in accordance with the 1973 regulations. In a cc action to recover the costs of the work, cc gave judgement in G`s favour for the full amount, rejecting W`s plea that his liability was limited by para 12(2) in the Schedule to the 1973 regulations. Cc accepted a submission that the procedure under the 1973 regulations was an option and did not rule out a remedy at common law for damages , based on breach of contract or statutory duty, unfettered by the limitation in the regulations. On appeal by W, CA held that cc`s dec
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aCASE LAW
650			_aREPAIR
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c24821 _d24821