000			01524cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS42738
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u38647
041			_aeng
245			_aCorson and others v Rhuddlan BC
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1990) 59 PCR 185-199(15)
520			_aCA 14 July 1989. Appeal by the council (R) from a High Court decision. The question was whether an option to renew a 21-year lease of land on which a golf course had been constructed, was a valid option effectively exercised by the golf club , as the High Court held it to be, or as R contended, was void for uncertainty. R claimed that the option was void because it did not provide for the rent to be paid, but provided only for the rent to be agreed. It made no provision for failure to agree. The plaintiffs (C) stated that they were willing to pay a rent of £1,150 and sought a declaration that the option had been validly exercised. High Court ordered that the option had been validly exercised. On appeal by R, CA held that the fact that an option in a lease which required the rent to be agreed by the parties was not fatal to the existence of an enforceable contract, if it was clear from the document as a whole that it was the clear contractual intention of the parties to be bound by th
650			_aCASE LAW
650			_aLEASE RENEWAL
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c24831 _d24831