| 000 | 01480cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS42742 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u38666 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRennie and another v Proma Ltd and another | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 17 EG 69-77(5) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 6 December 1989 Appeal by J Bynge (B) (Proma Ltd taking no part in the appeal) from a cc decision in favour of Mr and Mrs Rennie (R), on their application under Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s20 to acquire the freehold of a cottage held for a term of 99 years from December 1981. Difficulties had arisen from a transfer in 1985 which brought the cottage within the provisions and restrictions of a family settlement and trust for sale. The result was that the vesting of the title to the freehold in R required the appointment of an additional trustee of the trust for sale and the consent of B who refused to co-operate in the fulfillment of either condition. Cc held that by virtue of Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s23(1) and Law of Property Act 1925 s30 , the objections of B could be overcome and made declarations in favour of R. On appeal by B, CA upheld cc decision but on different grounds. The transfer in 1985 was a relevant agreement that related to the tenancy for the purposes of s23 of 196 | ||
| 650 | _aCASE LAW | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-LEASEHOLD REFORM | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c24843 _d24843 |
||