000			01581cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS42743
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u38672
041			_aeng
245			_aEmpson and another v Forde and another
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 18 EG 99-102(3)
520			_aCA 26 October 1989. Appeal by landlords (E) from cc decision refusing E an order for possession against the tenants (F) who occupied a ground floor flat in the property. E wanted to carry out repairs which would require F to move out temporarily. F was worried that the repairs could reduce their accommodation and increase their rent. F also feared that if they moved out they would not get back. After some time E served on F a notice to quit which converted their protected tenancy into a statutory tenancy . E claimed that the property invoked Cases 1 and 3 in Rent Act 1977 Sched 15 , but in order to bring themselves within Case 1 or Case 3, E had to prove that F had broken a term or condition of the tenancy. Cc judge decided that there had been no such breach and that there had been no refusal by F to allow access for the purpose of carrying out repairs. It was not necessary therefore to consider whether or not the order for possession was reasonable, but the judge was of the opinion
650			_aCASE LAW
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c24846 _d24846