| 000 | 00931cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2929-39 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u38710 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aGazumpers out of court | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aIndependent _v24 July 1993, 20 |
||
| 490 |
_aDaily Telegraph _v28 July 1993, 7 |
||
| 490 |
_aFinancial Times _v29 July 1993, 6(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the test case "Pitt v PHH Asset Management" upholding the purchasers argument that a sales agreement was a valid lock-out agreement (See WB2927-44). Seen as an important step in the movement to discourage gazumping. | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF CONTRACT | ||
| 650 | _aGAZUMPING | ||
| 650 | _aLOCK-OUT AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY SALES | ||
| 650 | _aSALE AGREEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aVENDOR AND PURCHASER | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c24865 _d24865 |
||