| 000 | 01593cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS42770 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u38761 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aHarvey v SoS for Wales | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1990) JPL 420-426(7) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 8 November 1989. Planning permissions were granted for a new farmhouse and `replacement bungalow` subject to conditions. Condition (f) imposed on the grant of permission for the replacement dwelling stated: `The existing farmhouse shall be demolished or used for ... agriculture other than a dwelling to the satisfaction of the planning authority and within one month of the beneficial use of the dwelling hereby approved.` Permitted development was carried out; a new farmhouse and the `replacement bungalow` were built. The `replacement bungalow` was occupied on 5 November 1977 and it followed from the wording of Condition (f) that by this date, the original `new bungalow` should either be demolished or used for agricultural purposes. Neither action was taken and it was common ground that there was a breach of Condition (f). The `new bungalow` remained empty until bought by H, who took up residence in 1984. Local authority served an enforcement notice specifying breach of Condition (f | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY | ||
| 650 | _aOCCUPANCY CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONDITIONS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c24889 _d24889 |
||