| 000 | 01252cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS42771 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u38765 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v SoS Environment , ex parte Davis | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1990) 59 PCR 306-314(9) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 11 May 1989 Application by Davis (D) for an order of certiorari to quash a decision of the first respondent, the SoS, in which he found that D had no interest in land within the meaning of Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s88 in relation to which the second respondent, the council, had served an enforcement notice , as D was a trespass er and an order of mandamus requiring the SoS to hear the appeal. QBD held that the SoS was entitled to conclude on the material before him that D was a trespasser and not someone in adverse possession and so had neither an interest in land under s88 nor a right to appeal against the enforcement notice. This decision would only be open to judicial review if it were shown to be perverse. | ||
| 650 | _aCASE LAW | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING APPEALS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c24891 _d24891 |
||