| 000 | 01450cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS42920 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u39586 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aThomson v Murray | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aScots Law Times _v1990 SLT 45-49(5) |
||
| 520 | _aSLC 23 October 1989. The landlord and tenant of an agricultural holding jointly applied to the Land Court to determine whether an area of ground formed part of the holding so as to determine the landlords right to exclude the tenant. If it did not form part of the holding were the landlords entitled to resume the said area and a further area from the holding under a clause of the tenancy giving the landlord "power to resume such part of his land as he may select for the purpose of ... forming plantations". The landlord wished to encourage regeneration of woodlands on the areas in question. It was held that the area did form part of the holding let to the tenant and the terms of the lease only granted to the landlords rights over the woods and timber however the landlord could resume the area as it would not alter the character of the tenant`s farm. | ||
| 650 | _aCASE LAW | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENT OF HOLDING | ||
| 650 | _aFOTHERINGHAM V FOTHERINGHAM | ||
| 650 | _aRESERVATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSCOTLAND | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c25387 _d25387 |
||