| 000 | 00986cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53445 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u4244 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aLewison, K. | ||
| 245 | _aRuling on ending of tenancy is terminally problematic | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v52(5-6) 3-10 August 1995, 25(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the implications of the "Esselte AB v Pearl Assurance" decision giving statutory protection to business tenants under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 even though the occupancy criteria is not met. Decision expected to be challenged in CA. | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aCESSATION OF BUSINESS USE | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II | ||
| 650 | _aOCCUPANCY | ||
| 650 | _aSTATUTORY PROTECTION | ||
| 650 | _aTERMINATION OF TENANCY | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c2543 _d2543 |
||