| 000 | 00959cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2744-19 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u39952 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aConstruction of lease | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1991 EGCS 106 (9/11/91) |
||
| 520 | _a"Kings (Estate Agents) Ltd v Anderson and another" ChD 24 October 1991. Concerned the landlord`s entitlement to a rent review for the residue of the lease, when the rent had not been agreed as set out in the lease six months before the review date. Also at issue was whether the landlord could apply to an arbitrator. | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c25578 _d25578 |
||