| 000 | 00854cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2913-27 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u40043 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aPossession proceedings | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1993 EGCS 52 27 March 1993(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Panayi and another v Roberts" CA 18 March 1993 centred on whether a notice which gave an incorrect date of termination was `substantially to the same effect` as a notice which gave the right date. Appeal allowed. The incorrect date was not to the same effect as a correct one. | ||
| 650 | _aASSURED SHORTHOLD TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aASSURED TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ACT 1988 | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c25645 _d25645 |
||