| 000 | 00855cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS43030 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u40059 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBeaufort House Developments Ltd v Zimmcor | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v(1990) CILL 599(1) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 26 June 1990. Appeal against HC decision (Abs 42619) by Z against damages awarded to B. Concerned with same form of contract as in Rosehaugh Stanhope (Broadgate Phase 6) plc v Redpath Dorman Long Ltd (Abs). It was held that Z was not to be treated in breach of contract and would have completed with a reasonable extension of time. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aNON-STANDARD FORM OF CONTRACT | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c25658 _d25658 |
||