| 000 | 01276cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS43077 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u40331 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSmith and Others v Draper | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 27 EG 69-72(3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 19 January 1990. Appeal by the tenant (D) from a decision against a possession order terminating the tenancy of an hotel . The landlord `s (S) Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25 notice was declared invalid and a second notice was served. D refused to give up the tenancy but failed to apply for the new tenancy within the statutory time limit . The question was whether D or S were estopped from taking steps in their interests. As D had not responded to the second notice S were entitled to an order for possession. CA upheld the CC decision that the landlords were entitled to possession although the appeal judge admitted the decision was harsh and regrettable. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aCASE LAW | ||
| 650 | _aMORROW V NADEEM | ||
| 650 | _aPEARSON V ALYO | ||
| 650 | _aTERMINATION | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c25839 _d25839 |
||