000			01380cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS43079
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u40339
041			_aeng
245			_aKensington Pension Developments Ltd v Royal Garden Hotel (Oddenino`s) Ltd
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 27 EG 79
520			_aChD 25 January 1990. An underlease was granted by K in 1964 to R for construction of a new hotel for 150 years with regular rent reviews . Questions arose because part of the new building was outside the area of the land demised. Should the valuer for purposes of rent review schedule, value the hotel as it stood or only the demised premises which did not include the whole of the hotel. The doctrine of accretion or encroachment should be applied and the whole of the hotel should be valued. A yearly rack rental value should also be charged on the whole building as a hypothetical tenant would have acquired the whole of the building including the portion not included in the demised part of the hotel.
650			_aEASTWOOD V ASHTON
650			_aMORTON V WOODS
650			_aPLAN
650			_aSMIRK V LYNDALE DEVELOPMENTS LTD
650			_aSUBLEASE
650			_aWHITMORE V HAMPLINES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c25845 _d25845