| 000 | 01521cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS43110 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u40469 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aFolioshield Ltd v Pleamere Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 28 EG 124-126(2) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 12 January 1990. Dispute between two property companies over sole letting agreement. P appointed F as sole letting agent of rooms on certain floors of a property which F had introduced to P, for twelve months from date of completion of acquisition. This was followed by a supplemental agreement stating that the twelve month period should run from date of possession instead of date of completion. The original contained a clause stating that P would not assign the property without first procuring that the proposed assignee should enter into a sole letting agreement. P entered into a contract to sell leasehold property to a third company and terminated sole agency agreement with F. F claimed damages for breach of contract . P Claimed that the contract was revocable and the agreement had only been a contract to sell and not a completed assignment. It was held that the contract was an assignment in equity . P was liable for breach of contract. An inquiry to establish damages was ordere | ||
| 650 | _aAGENCY | ||
| 650 | _aOAKACRE LTD V CLAIRE CLEANERS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c25935 _d25935 |
||