| 000 | 01307cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS43126 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u40518 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aStritzel v Kubbinga (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v(1990) RVR 121-124(4) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 17 May 1990. Appeal by ratepayer (S) against a decision of lvc by (K) reducing the assessment of a workshop , rented by S to £435gv £334rv. Workshop is situated in a yard surrounded by residential property with poor access through a communal yard. Appeal based on two factors, firstly if the assessment under the General Rate Act 1967 s19 is fair and secondly if at the time of the assessment there had been any changes in the state of the hereditament and locality in accordance with the General Rate Act 1967 s20 . The LT accepted that the quality of accommodation and the vehicle access were poor. Occupation of the surrounding buildings had changed the state of the hereditament. Rateable value was amended to £280gv £207rv. Appeal allowed with £30 costs awarded to S. | ||
| 650 | _aINDUSTRIAL PROPERTY | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEAL | ||
| 650 | _aREDUCTION | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c25959 _d25959 |
||