| 000 | 01003cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | E2780 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u40913 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCayzer v Hamilton (No.1) | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aScots Law Times _v1996 SLT (Land CT) 18-21 (4) |
||
| 520 | _aScottish Land Court. Lord Philip, D D McDiarmid, J Kinloch. 1 February 1994. Landlord and tenant - agricultural holding - notice to remedy - validity - whether extrinsic evidence admissible to explain notice - whether notice requireed to specify provision of lease allegedly breached - Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991 | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1991 | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS | ||
| 650 |
_aLANDLORD AND TENANT _96252 |
||
| 650 | _aNOTICE TO REMEDY | ||
| 650 | _aSCOTTISH LAND COURT | ||
| 650 | _aSLC | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c26233 _d26233 |
||