| 000 | 00995cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS43260 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u41112 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aDebenham Tewson & Chinnocks v Rimington and another | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 34 EG 55-58(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 17 May 1990. D was contesting the quantum meruit figure decided by the High Court as commission from R for assisting in a sale of land . The peculiarity of this sale, which meant that D did not gain the usual 1.5% commission, was that R had both a family and business connection with the purchaser of the land so that it was not an "arm`s length" sale and while D were involved in tentative talks with the purchaser`s agents, D did not agree the sale price; this was done by the principals themselves. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c26397 _d26397 |
||