| 000 | 00962cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS43302 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u41279 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aJones, E. | ||
| 245 | _aBates and Murphy: a return to the snail in the bottle? | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v134(39) 28 September 1990, 1094-1095(2) |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at the wider implications for the construction industry of the recent decisions in Murphy v Brentwood D C and DoE v Thomas E Bates and Sons Ltd, in particular the influence which Commonwealth decisions are beginning to have on English caselaw,as highlighted by the above cases. | ||
| 650 | _aBISHOP REPORT | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS-CONSTRUCTION COLLATERAL WARRANTY FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aINTERNATIONAL LAW | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-DEFECTS AND FAILURES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c26526 _d26526 |
||