000			01688cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS43386
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u41517
041			_aeng
245			_aTemple & Crook Ltd v Capital and Counties Property Co Ltd
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 38 EG 118-120(2)
520			_aChD 18 May 1990. Application for leave to appeal by tenants (T) from an arbitrator`s decision in relation to a rent review clause in leases of two adjoining shops. The determination of the rent had been referred to arbitration , and had to be determined on the basis of an open market value for leasehold premises held on a lease subject to the actual terms and conditions of the subject lease. The approaches adopted by the rival surveyors varied; the landlords` surveyor using comparables and T`s surveyor, the profits method of valuation. The arbitrator decided the rent should be considerably more than that contended by the tenants, but only slightly over half contended by the landlords. T sought leave to appeal. The Judge concluded that the case was a `one-off` case which related to the last review period; the arbitrator had made no `obvious error of law` and held that the `more lenient test` was not satisfied as he did not entertain any suspicion that the arbitrator was wrong. Leave t
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aCORNWALL COAST COUNTRY CLUB V CARDGRANGE LTD
650			_aIPSWICH B C V FISONS PLC
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c26660 _d26660