| 000 | 01285cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS43389 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u41524 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aViscount Chelsea and another v Muscatt | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 35 EG 63-68(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 14 May 1990 Appeal by Mrs Muscatt (M) from QBD decision granting a final mandatory injunction for reinstatement of part of a parapet wall in front of premises. M had lowered the parapet wall in clear breach of covenant and despite warnings, had refused to reinstate it. The landlord commenced proceedings by writ, claiming a mandatory injunction for reinstatement of the wall and applied for a summary final judgement which was granted by QBD. On appeal by M, CA held that this was a clear case of a flagrant breach of covenant carried out in an almost subversive fashion and that QBD was entitled to take a strong view and that no substantial defence could be made out at a trial. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aCASE LAW | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c26663 _d26663 |
||