000			01218cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS43413
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u41600
041			_aeng
245			_aMuseprime Properties Ltd v Adhill Properties Ltd
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 36 EG 114-124(6)
520			_aChD 27 February 1990. Action by M seeking recission of a contract signed at auction , return of a deposit of £49,000 and damages to cover conveyancing expenses thrown away, on the ground that they were induced to enter into the contract by a material misrepresentation for which A, vendors of three properties in North London were responsible. Rents from the three properties had been wrongly misrepresented at the auction as open to negotiation . ChD held that M had established their claim to the recission of the contract on the ground of material misrepresentation for which A were responsible. M were entitled to return of their deposit and damages in respect of lost conveyancing expenses with interest.
650			_aCASE LAW
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c26705 _d26705