| 000 | 00859cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2530-15 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u4473 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNotice to quit for subletting | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v1989 113 |
||
| 520 | _aThe landlord sought a declaration that the counternotice in reply to a notice to quit for subletting in breach of the tenancy agreement was invalid. The tenant was able to demonstrate that the notice to quit in accordance with Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 Schedule 3 Case E and s26(2) was invalid as he had correspondence from the landlord agreeing to the subletting of the cottages. The case was Lord Rous (Earl of Stradbroke) v Mitchell ChD 14 July 1989. | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c2694 _d2694 |
||