| 000 | 00784cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2520-26 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u41970 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aUnoccupied property and hardship | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v1989 75 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Huzminor Investments Developments Ltd v City of Wakefield MDC , QBD 8 May 1989, the appeal was allowed on the grounds that the corporate veil could not be lifted; the identity of shareholders and the absence of any hardship to them was irrelevant and for the purposes of General Rate Act 1967 Sched 1 there is a definition of `hardship` in Re Windsor Securities Ltd (1978) . | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c26952 _d26952 |
||