| 000 | 00946cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3017-53 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u41993 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aAccess suggestion | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _vTimes 5 May 1994, 36(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn "Ex parte Harrow LBC", QBD 18 April 1994, it was held that where an inspector had dismissed an appeal against a refusal of planning permission because of unsatisfactory access to the highway, but had of his own motion suggested an alternative access which neither party had proposed and which had not been the subject of any submissions or representations, that suggestion should not be afforded undue weight on a subsequent planning application. | ||
| 650 | _aACCESS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aREFUSAL | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c26969 _d26969 |
||