000			01544cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS43530
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u42227
041			_aeng
245			_aRous v Mitchell
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v(1990) NLJ 1386-1387(2)
520			_aCA 31 July 1990. The plaintiff, X. was freehold owner of an estate which included two farms let to Y in 1953. The tenancy of the farms, which included a number of cottages , was subject to a covenant preventing assignment or underletting other than to workmen on the farms. In July 1980 X served notice to quit on Y under Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 s26 alleging breach of covenant . Under Sched 3 Case E a landlord of an agricultural holding was entitled to possession if at the date of the giving of notice the landlords` interest in the holding had been materially prejudiced by a breach of covenant by the tenant which was not capable of being remedied. Y instead of claiming arbitration under Agricultural Holdings (Arbitration on Notice) Order 1987 for the resolution of a Case E despute, served a counternotice requiring the notice to be referred to an agricultural lands tribunal . X served a writ claiming a declaration that in the absence of a counternotice requiring arbitration the t
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aTIED COTTAGES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c27122 _d27122