000			01456cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS43531
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u42231
041			_aeng
245			_aJavad v Aqil
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1990) 41 EG 61-65(5)
520			_aCA 15 May 1990. The plaintiff, J, owned business premises and entered into negotiations with the defendant, A, with a view to A taking a lease . They had problems in reaching agreement on some of the terms such as whether A should have the right to sublet, nonetheless since A had nowhere else to put his stock, J gave him the keys and a receipt for £2,500, rent for three months in advance. Solicitors carried on negotiating the lease. A paid a further two installments of rent and some insurance rent. Completion of the permanent lease never took place and J brought possession proceedings. A claimed that he was a periodic tenant protected by Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 . H claimed that A had been a tenant at will whose tenancy had been determined by the demand of possession. The judge made an order for possession. A appealed. CA held that A had not become a periodic tenant therefore where parties are negotiating the terms of a proposed lease, and the prospective tenant is let into posse
650			_aLEASE TERMS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c27124 _d27124