| 000 | 01392cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS43560 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u42351 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aR v Alath Construction Ltd ; R v Brightman | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1990) 1 WLR 1255-1260(6) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 20 February 1990. A beech tree , standing on A`s land was subject of a tree preservation order . A made a number of unsuccessful applications for permission to fell the tree. After the storms of 1987 A made arrangements for the tree to be felled without obtaining permission. They were charged with contravening a TPO under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s102 . S60 of that Act provides that a TPO should not apply to the felling of trees that are dying, dead or dangerous. The recorder made a preliminary ruling that the burden of proof lay on A and they were convicted. A`s appeal was quashed on the grounds that s120 created an absolute offence therefore the prosecution had only to prove that the act was committed, s60 did not create negative ingredients of the offence but provided a true exemption from liability which had to be proved by A. | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S60 | ||
| 650 | _aTREE FELLING | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c27169 _d27169 |
||