| 000 | 00956cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS43765 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u43396 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPowell-Smith, V. | ||
| 245 | _aSchooling contractors in the formula approach | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v356(5797) 22 November 1990, 8(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the formula approach for calculating head office overheads in settling building contract claims . Considers the Eichleay formula , Hudson formula and Emden formula . Refers to case law . | ||
| 650 | _aBERLEY INDUSTRIES INC V CITY OF NEW YORK | ||
| 650 | _aELLIS DON V PARKING AUTHORITY OF TORONTO | ||
| 650 | _aHOME INSURANCE CO V MENTOR | ||
| 650 | _aIMODCO LTD V WIMPEY MAJOR PROJECTS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aJF FINNEGAN LTD V SHEFFIELD CC | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c27704 _d27704 |
||