| 000 | 01100cab a2200313 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Z1761 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u43434 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aMarlow, S. | ||
| 245 | _aInternational commonhold | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9232) 15 August 1992, 45-47(2) |
||
| 520 | _aConclusions from a study of commonhold systems in Australia, France and the USA. While determining the system successful in all three countries with increasing popularity, the study did identify the problems of management, disputes and recourse to ADR, service charges and lack of knowledge on the part of owners of what commonhold means. | ||
| 650 | _aALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION | ||
| 650 | _aAUSTRALIA | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMONHOLD | ||
| 650 | _aDISPUTES | ||
| 650 | _aFRANCE | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONS | ||
| 650 |
_aProperty management _96262 |
||
| 650 | _aSERVICE CHARGES | ||
| 650 | _aUSA | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 700 | _aRivers, S. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c27717 _d27717 |
||