000			01011cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS43838
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u43710
041			_aeng
245			_aLinden Gardens v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd ; McLaughlin & Harvey plc ; and Ashwell Construction Co Ltd
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v[1990] CILL 612-613(2)
520			_aCA 13 February 1992. The court had to decide on the construction and effect of the prohibition on assignment. It was held that prohibition on assignment did prevent the benefit of the rights to call for the performance of the contracts from being assignable. However, assignment of benefits and claims for damages for the removal of asbestos under the contracts were allowed, where the cause of action had accrued at the date of the assignment.
650			_aASSIGNMENT
650			_aJCT 1963 CLAUSE 17
690			_aLAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c27856 _d27856