000			01197cab a2200241 4500
001			WB2825-35
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u43933
041			_aeng
245			_aMisrepresentation
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1992 EGCS 85(1) 20/6/92
520			_aIn "Neighbour and another v Baker and another" CA 5 June 1992, the CA upheld the plaintiff purchaser`s claim that the vendor was negligent by not making the details of the structural cracks known to him. However, the claim against the purchaser`s solicitors was dismissed on the grounds that they had advised their client to commission a structural survey before completion and that at the stage when the cracks were discovered had acted professionally in advising their client to continue with the sale, as this would almost certainly be the cheapest course of action.
650			_aDAMAGES
650			_aMISREPRESENTATION
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aSTRUCTURAL DEFECTS
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c28004 _d28004