000			01081cab a2200229 4500
001			WB2809-40
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u44201
041			_aeng
245			_aProfessional services: fees
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1992 EGCS 19(2) (22 February 1992)
520			_aIn "Lingard & Partners v Snowdon Mountain Railway and another" QBD 17 January 1992, a claim by architects for payment of fees for work carried out on a feasibility study for a tourist project on behalf of defendants was dismissed. A written agreement had been made in March 1985 for out-of-pocket expenses for outlining proposals. CA dismissed appellant`s claim that the developers were obliged to apply for planning permision even though planning permission was unlikely.
650			_aFEASIBILITY STUDY
650			_aOUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES
650			_aPROFESSIONAL FEES
650			_aTOURISM
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c28176 _d28176