| 000 | 01147cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2809-44 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u44218 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMisdescription | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1992 EGCS 20(1) (22 February 1992) |
||
| 520 | _a"Toplis v Green" CA 14 February 1992 concerned a dispute over a strip of land adjacent to property sold and the vendor farmers claim for trespass and damages. In dismissing the purchasers appeal alleging that the high court had wrongly allowed evidence extrinsic to plan, it was held that although the plan was not accurate it was annexed to the transfer and the purchasers had clearly seen where the boundary lay. the allegation of a breach of duty of care by the vendor was also dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aACCURATE PLAN | ||
| 650 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 650 | _aSURVEYORS' DUTY OF CARE | ||
| 650 | _aINACCURATE PLAN | ||
| 650 | _aSTRIP OF LAND | ||
| 650 | _aVENDOR AND PURCHASER | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c28187 _d28187 |
||