000			01558cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS43981
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u44555
041			_aeng
245			_aSpringfield Investments Ltd v Bell
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 02 EG 157-163(4)
520			_aCA 8 June 1990 Appeal by tenant (B) from a cc decision granting the landlords (S) an order for possession of a cottage under Rent Act 1977 Sched 15 Case 16 (where a dwelling has at any time been occupied by a person employed in agriculture and is required for such a person employed by the landlord). CC accepted the evidence on behalf of S that a copy of a fair rent certificate was given to B, prior to the grant of the tenancy, and that the document stated that it was proposed to let on a regulated tenancy basis, subject to Case 16. B contended that Case 16(b) had not been complied with, in that the certificate was not a notice for the purposes of Case 16; it was not a notice given to the tenant, but a document issued to the landlord who gave it to the tenant. CA held, dismissing appeal, that a notice satisfying Case 16(b) does not have to be in a specific form. The certificate made it clear to B that possession might be required for an agricultural worker . Therefore it satisfied Cas
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aLAW CASE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c28318 _d28318