000			01616cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS43982
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u44561
041			_aeng
245			_aStradbroke (Earl of) v Mitchell
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 03 EG 128-135; 04 EG 132-136(10)
520			_aCA 31 July 1990 Appeal by landlord (S) from ChD decision that a notice to quit given by S purporting to terminate the tenancy of two farms held by the defendant (M), was a nullity because of fraudulent misrepresentations contained in the notice. S had served a notice on M in accordance with Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 Sched 3 Case E on the grounds that M had let five cottages on the tenanted land, in breach of covenant, to people not working on the farm. M contended that S had previously given his consent to four of the lettings or they were not in fact let in breach of covenant. With regard to the fifth, the letting had already come to an end before the service of the notice and therefore did not constitute an irremediable breach. After considering four questions raised by the case, CA held, dismissing the appeal, that a notice to quit was invalid and to no effect if it contained a statement which was false and which the landlord had made fraudulently, whether or not the tenant....
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aCASE LAW
650			_aFRAUD
650			_aROUS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c28321 _d28321