000			01215cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS43984
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u44574
041			_aeng
245			_aJavad v Aqil
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v(1991) 1 All ER 243-254(12)
520			_aCA 15 May 1990 Appeal by Aqil (A) against cc decision ordering him to give up possession of business premises to Javad (J), on the ground that he had a tenancy at will when J gave notice to quit and not a periodic tenancy. CA held, dismissing the appeal, that where a prospective tenant was allowed into possession and thereafter paid quarterly rent pending negotiation of the lease, it was to be inferred that the parties intended to create a tenancy at will, since the parties could not be taken to have intended that the periodic payments of rent would create a periodic tenancy when they were not agreed as to the terms on which the prospective tenant would occupy. J was therefore entitled to possession.
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aLEASE TERMS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c28327 _d28327