000			01484cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS43986
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u44589
041			_aeng
245			_aHoward and another v Midrome and others
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 03 EG 135-136(2)
520			_aChD 16 July 1990 Application by motion for an interim management order appointing a company representing the tenants to manage a block of flats . Management by the landlords was `simply non-existent` and there was an urgent problem of a leak ing roof . ChD were satisfied that within the terms of Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s24 (2)(a)(i) and (ii) that the landlords were in breach of their obligations to the tenants and the circumstances were such that the breaches were likely to continue. The management company was appointed and further proceedings would be transferred to the county court. ChD also held that it would not be "just and convenient" to use the words of s24(2)(a)(iii) to allow the present conditions in regard to management to continue, pending the trial of the originating summons between the parties. The damage caused by the leaking roof was getting worse and there was no suggestion from the landlords that if the order was not made, they would take steps to remedy the sit
650			_aCASE LAW
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c28335 _d28335