000			01641cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS50783
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u45253
041			_aeng
245			_aPiper Double Glazing Ltd v DC Contracts
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1994) 1 WLR 777-788(12)
520			_aQBD 23 December 1992. Am award of costs in two arbitrations on disputes arising from termination of contracts for the supply and installation of building materials were to be taxed by a taxing master of the Supreme Court. He dismissed the supplier`s (D) written objections to the taxation. D applied for a review of the taxation and whether there was power to allow costs incurred by an unqualified person (claims consultants) in relation to arbitration and the basis of assessment of such costs. Held, it was the intention of the Arbitration Act 1950 s18(2) to permit taxation of any costs ordered to be paid by an arbitrator`s award, including the costs of non-qualified representatives. In relation to such a taxation RSC Order 62 was to be construed as enabling full effect to be given to an arbitrator`s costs order by allowing full recovery of reasonable costs of such representatives reasonably incurred.
650			_aAWARD OF COSTS
650			_aCLAIMS CONSULTANTS
650			_aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
650			_aCOSTS
650			_aJAMES R KNOWLES
650			_aREPRESENTATION
650			_aTAXATION
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c28761 _d28761