| 000 | 01483cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51822 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u45366 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBannister v SoS Environment and another | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) EG 164-167(3) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 15 July 1994. The second respondent, X, appealed against an enforcement notice requiring him to cease using a dwelling house contrary to an occupation condition imposed with the grant of planning permission in 1981. On appeal the inspector concluded that the occupancy condition had not been appropriately imposed in the first place. B contended that the inspector was not entitled to consider the history and surrounding circumstances of the original planning permission, that he had failed to consider the current situation and had not given clear and adequate reasons. S contended that B, who owned adjoining land, was not a person aggrieved and entitled to make the application. Held, application allowed and decision quashed. | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aBANNISTER V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aOCCUPANCY CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c28807 _d28807 |
||