| 000 | 01556cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS44122 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u45436 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMann v Gardner and another | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1991) 61 PCR 1-10(6) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 14 June 1990. An agricultural tenancy agreement was created in 1970 between landlord M`s predecessor in title and tenant G. In 1983 G became a joint tenant and a new rent was fixed. In 1985 it was agreed that G would surrender possession of a cottage which had previously been occupied by an employee of G. For this the rent would be reduced. In October 1986 G served notice demanding arbitration to determine the rent under Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 s12 . M served a similar notice. In October 1987 two further parcels of land were added to the holding and the rent was increased. An arbitrator was appointed in November 1987 with G contending that the rent should be reduced and M that it should be increased. However before the hearing M`s solicitors objected to the proceedings so it became a special hearing at County Court, which held in favour of G with the case being remitted to the arbitrator. M appealed to CA. The point arising was whether there was a previous rise or fall in r | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aCASE LAW | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c28828 _d28828 |
||