000			01468cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS44147
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u45540
041			_aeng
245			_aNewbury DC v SoS Environment and another
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 06 EG 164-170(3)
520			_aCA 16 March 1990. The land in question was an area of nearly five acres owned and occupied by the second respondent G. On the northern side of the site, an area of 0.4 acres, there was a stable block for which planning permission was granted after its erection in 1986. The rest of the site was used for grazing horses. In May 1988 the council served an enforcement notice on G alleging a breach of planning control , namely a change of use of the land to the mixed use of agriculture , stationing a mobile home for residential purposes and stationing two touring-type caravans . G appealed to the SoS on the grounds that planning permission ought to be granted for the development to which the enforcement notice related. G submitted a plan showing a housing development which delineated most of the stable site by a red line and the words "where planning permission ought to be granted for mobile home and caravan". They also maintained that the notice should not have referred to the whole site
650			_aCASE LAW
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c28861 _d28861