000			01567cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS44166
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u45609
041			_aeng
245			_aHowell v Montey and others
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1991)61 PCR 18-22(3)
520			_aCA 7 March 1990. The plaintiffs, M, were owners of a freehold house. The appellant H had recovered judgement against them in the sum of £2,173 and had subsequently obtained a charging order nisi upon the house. Shortly after M entered into a contract to sell the house. The purchasers obtained a certificate of search which gave them priority until 29 September 1987. The sale was completed on 4 September. On 16 September H applied to the Land Registry to register notice of the charging order against the title. The purchasers did not apply to register their title until 9 October by which time their priority period had expired. The registration of title took effect subject to the charging order nisi, which was subsequently made absolute. The purchaser applied to discharge the charging order and the registrar acceded to that application. An appeal against that decision was dismissed. the CA also dismissed the appeal holding that the order absolute should not have been made. It did not see
650			_aCASE LAW
650			_aLAND CHARGES
650			_aSALE OF LAND
650			_aVENDOR AND PURCHASER
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c28885 _d28885