| 000 | 01035cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2849-37 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u45831 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent review | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1992) EGCS 152(2) (12/12/92) |
||
| 520 | _a"London General Holdings Ltd v Kingston upon Thames Nominees Ltd" ChD 1 December 1992. L, a tenant, claimed a declaration against its landlord that the rent had not been reviewed as from May 1991. L`s increase proposal had been met with silence from the landlord which was presumed to be acceptance. When, therefore, a much larger rent demand was presented by the landlord`s assignees in July, several weeks after the date of review, L challenged it in the courts. Application refused. | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICE OF INTENTION | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c28996 _d28996 |
||