000			01294cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS44270
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u46277
041			_aeng
245			_aHenniker-Major and others v Daniel Smith (a firm) and others
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 12 EG 58-63(4)
520			_aCA 1 November 1991. Appeal by defendant surveyor Daniel Smith (a firm) (d) against a HC decision over construction of a rent review clause in a shop lease. Trigger notice not served within time limit . Date from which increase of rent, specified in belated notice, became payable was the main issue. Plaintiff landlords considered they had lost a year`s increase and claimed damages against D for alleged negligence in serving the notice late. D claimed that on true construction of the lease, there had been no loss of a year`s increase. Appeal by D on the preliminary issue. CA declared that any increase of rent payable in accordance with a rent notice served between 25 March 1980 and 25 March 1981 was payable from the earlier date.
650			_aSURVEYORS
650			_aUNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c29281 _d29281