| 000 | 01149cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS44274 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u46301 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aTurton, J. | ||
| 245 | _aDemolition and forfeiture | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v135 (10) 15 March 1991, 326 (1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decisions in Cambridge CC v SOS for Environment and Billson v Residential Apartments which have important implications for developers and landlords . The former held that demolition constitutes development, therefore requiring planning permission whilst the latter illustrates how effective forfeiture can be as a landlord`s remedy for breach of covenant . | ||
| 650 | _aBILLSON AND OTHERS V RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCOVENANT AGAINST ALTERATION | ||
| 650 |
_aLANDLORD AND TENANT _96252 |
||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146 | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGEES | ||
| 650 | _aPEACEABLE RE-ENTRY | ||
| 650 | _aRELIEF | ||
| 650 | _aSECTION 146 NOTICES | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c29294 _d29294 |
||