000			01430cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS44317
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u46556
041			_aeng
245			_aEast Hampshire DC v Davies
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1991) 10 EG 149-158(3)
520			_aCA 20 November 1990. Appeal by East Hampshire DC (E) against a HC decision dismissing an application for an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant Davies (D) from using a site as a winter stopover for mobile homes and caravans . D purchased the land whilst already subject of an enforcement notice under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 . E issued three summonses against the defendant for failure to comply with the enforcement notice served on his predecessor and issued a writ claiming an injunction restraining D from residing or storing mobile homes on the site. D applied for planning permission and was refused. Three further enforcement notices were served on D as the present owner. CA considered American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd applying the principle of balance of convenience . Amongst the key factors considered were whether damages would be an adequate remedy and the appropriateness of granting injunctions to a local authority before trying the effect of criminal pr
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c29456 _d29456