000			01512cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS44318
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u46563
041			_aeng
245			_aSave Britain`s Heritage v Number 1 Poultry and Others
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1991) 1 WLR 153-172(20)
520			_aHL 28 February 1991. HL reversed CA decision (Abstract 43728) allowing a listed building to be replaced on grounds of architectural merit. The owners Number 1 Poultry proposed a redevelopment of eight Grade II listed buildings in a designated conservation area in the City of London and their replacement by a single modern building. Local planning authority refused application for planning permission . On hearing N`s appeal, the SOS after accepting his Inspector`s recommendations that the architectural merits of the proposed replacement, decided to over-ride his stated policy set out in DOE Circular 8/87 . Judge dismissed an objector`s application under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s245 that the SOS had failed to give sufficient reasons for his decision as required under Town and Country Planning (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 1988 17(1) . Save Britain`s Heritage (S) appealed to CA. CA quashed the SOS`s decision. N appealed to HL. HL allowed the appeal. It was held that their repla
650			_aDEMOLITION
650			_aPALUMBO
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c29459 _d29459