| 000 | 01368cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53519 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u4882 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aJames Lazenby & Co v McNicholas Construction Co Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aAll England Law Reports _v(1995) 3 AllER 821-841 (10) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 7 November, 21 December 1994. In 1988, the plaintiff (L) began proceedings against M over the pricing and costs of a labour-only sub-contract. The proceedings were stayed pursuant to an arbitration clause in the contract. After 15 months L commenced arbitration. There was then a delay of 9 months and, in July 1992, M applied to strike out L`s claim under the Arbitration Act 1950 s13A . The application was rejected on the grounds that s13A came into force in January 1992 and was not retrospective. Following a HL decision in 1993 that s13A was retrospective, the arbitrator issued a final award in which he dismissed L`s claim under s13A. L appealed. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1950 S13A | ||
| 650 | _aCOURTS AND LEGAL SERVICES ACT 1990 | ||
| 650 | _aDISMISSAL OF CLAIM | ||
| 650 | _aINORDINATE AND INEXCUSABLE DELAY | ||
| 650 | _aJAMES LAZENBY & CO V MCNICHOLAS CONSTRUCTION LTD | ||
| 690 | _aARBITRATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c2951 _d2951 |
||