| 000 | 01373cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51852 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u46847 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aGreen (VO) v Barnet LBC | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v(1994) 9 RA 235-257(12) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 21 July 1994. A stadium and a swimming pool, run by B was regarded as exempt from rating as a public park under General Rate Act 1967 s44, with the exception of the pavilions occupied by sports clubs. G decided that the swimming pool and the stadium each constituted a separate hereditament and should be entered as such in the valuation list. In March 1989 G made a proposal for the separate assessment of the pool claiming that the pool and the stadium each had a separate curtilage capable of clear definition, demonstrated by reference to a plan. B contended that they fell within a combined curtilage and constituted a single hereditament. Held that the swimming pool was separate. | ||
| 650 | _aCURTILAGE | ||
| 650 | _aGENERAL RATE ACT 1967 | ||
| 650 | _aGREEN (VO) V BARNET LBC | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aSEPARATE HEREDITAMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aSPORTS CENTRES | ||
| 650 | _aSTADIUMS | ||
| 650 | _aSWIMMING POOLS | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c29577 _d29577 |
||